<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress, duplicate content and the power of Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.milienzo.com/2007/03/14/wordpress-duplicate-content-and-the-power-of-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.milienzo.com/2007/03/14/wordpress-duplicate-content-and-the-power-of-google/</link>
	<description>Jason Stone blogs about Web Design, Trends and Weekly Findings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:31:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.milienzo.com/2007/03/14/wordpress-duplicate-content-and-the-power-of-google/comment-page-1/#comment-20833</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 19:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milienzo.com/2007/03/14/wordpress-duplicate-content-and-the-power-of-google/#comment-20833</guid>
		<description>Hi Aaron, 

Good Post.  You make 2 good points: On Search Engines in general and on Wordpress.  

You nicely underscore the problems with Optimizing for just a single source... What if that source &#039;changes its mind&#039;?  

And regarding Wordpress kicking out a lot of duplicate content by default... they&#039;ve managed to give you a nice update regarding that in the latest versions.  When you&#039;re typing your post in Wordpress, be sure to scan the Editing Icons for a Button labeled &quot;Insert More Tag&quot;.  This will allow you to select the first X words/sentences where you want to break the text.  This leaves a nice &quot;Read the rest of this entry&quot; Link on ALL pages (home page, posts page, tags/categories/archives/etc.) except for your Actual Post Page.  This REMOVES a LOT of duplicate content from your site to keep Google happier.  

And for Feeds, Recent Wordpress versions also allow you to select between Full and Partial content in your feeds.

Again, keep coming with your excellent work,
Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Aaron, </p>
<p>Good Post.  You make 2 good points: On Search Engines in general and on Wordpress.  </p>
<p>You nicely underscore the problems with Optimizing for just a single source&#8230; What if that source &#8216;changes its mind&#8217;?  </p>
<p>And regarding Wordpress kicking out a lot of duplicate content by default&#8230; they&#8217;ve managed to give you a nice update regarding that in the latest versions.  When you&#8217;re typing your post in Wordpress, be sure to scan the Editing Icons for a Button labeled &#8220;Insert More Tag&#8221;.  This will allow you to select the first X words/sentences where you want to break the text.  This leaves a nice &#8220;Read the rest of this entry&#8221; Link on ALL pages (home page, posts page, tags/categories/archives/etc.) except for your Actual Post Page.  This REMOVES a LOT of duplicate content from your site to keep Google happier.  </p>
<p>And for Feeds, Recent Wordpress versions also allow you to select between Full and Partial content in your feeds.</p>
<p>Again, keep coming with your excellent work,<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: search marketing company</title>
		<link>http://www.milienzo.com/2007/03/14/wordpress-duplicate-content-and-the-power-of-google/comment-page-1/#comment-15742</link>
		<dc:creator>search marketing company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milienzo.com/2007/03/14/wordpress-duplicate-content-and-the-power-of-google/#comment-15742</guid>
		<description>Most people use the internet for information, products and even services. They search for their needs through the search engines. As you can see, as you type a specific keyword at the major search engines such as Yahoo, Google and MSN, you will find a lot of results – about thousands of results. But of course, those results that are found on the top rank are the ones that visitors or internet users will take time to look and visit. Since they believe that those results are the reliable ones for the information, products or services that they need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people use the internet for information, products and even services. They search for their needs through the search engines. As you can see, as you type a specific keyword at the major search engines such as Yahoo, Google and MSN, you will find a lot of results – about thousands of results. But of course, those results that are found on the top rank are the ones that visitors or internet users will take time to look and visit. Since they believe that those results are the reliable ones for the information, products or services that they need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webrevenue.org</title>
		<link>http://www.milienzo.com/2007/03/14/wordpress-duplicate-content-and-the-power-of-google/comment-page-1/#comment-9085</link>
		<dc:creator>webrevenue.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milienzo.com/2007/03/14/wordpress-duplicate-content-and-the-power-of-google/#comment-9085</guid>
		<description>Well... I got here through Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; I got here through Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog, Ideawarz, Android Themes Canadian Dmca - Cambrian House, Home of Crowdsourcing</title>
		<link>http://www.milienzo.com/2007/03/14/wordpress-duplicate-content-and-the-power-of-google/comment-page-1/#comment-8108</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog, Ideawarz, Android Themes Canadian Dmca - Cambrian House, Home of Crowdsourcing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 05:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milienzo.com/2007/03/14/wordpress-duplicate-content-and-the-power-of-google/#comment-8108</guid>
		<description>[...] option which suddenly appeared on our Gmail screens. This not only reminded us how much power Google wields&#8230; but how much we like Gmail. So random CH staffers helped us illustrate the magic which is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] option which suddenly appeared on our Gmail screens. This not only reminded us how much power Google wields&#8230; but how much we like Gmail. So random CH staffers helped us illustrate the magic which is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.milienzo.com/2007/03/14/wordpress-duplicate-content-and-the-power-of-google/comment-page-1/#comment-1558</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 03:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milienzo.com/2007/03/14/wordpress-duplicate-content-and-the-power-of-google/#comment-1558</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Incredible, I didn&#039;t realize that this was the case.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incredible, I didn&#8217;t realize that this was the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberdose</title>
		<link>http://www.milienzo.com/2007/03/14/wordpress-duplicate-content-and-the-power-of-google/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>uberdose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milienzo.com/2007/03/14/wordpress-duplicate-content-and-the-power-of-google/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>I still don&#039;t quite buy this, it could have been other factors. I&#039;m still ranking with pages with duplicate pages side by side in the SERPs.

But I have included a noindex in the All in One SEO Plugin , just to make sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still don&#8217;t quite buy this, it could have been other factors. I&#8217;m still ranking with pages with duplicate pages side by side in the SERPs.</p>
<p>But I have included a noindex in the All in One SEO Plugin , just to make sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.milienzo.com/2007/03/14/wordpress-duplicate-content-and-the-power-of-google/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milienzo.com/2007/03/14/wordpress-duplicate-content-and-the-power-of-google/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;neil&lt;/strong&gt; - I&#039;m as sure as I can be without Google explicitly telling me what I was being punished for. I did quite a lot of research into it and the issue is quite well documented elsewhere - I&#039;m not the only person thats been stung like this.

And I dont think it&#039;s a coincidence that I&#039;m back in Google&#039;s SERPs after implementing the duplicate content precautions.

However, what is unclear is the fact that many WordPress installations manage to go unpunished by Google without taking any of the precautions. It seems a bit hit and miss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>neil</strong> &#8211; I&#8217;m as sure as I can be without Google explicitly telling me what I was being punished for. I did quite a lot of research into it and the issue is quite well documented elsewhere &#8211; I&#8217;m not the only person thats been stung like this.</p>
<p>And I dont think it&#8217;s a coincidence that I&#8217;m back in Google&#8217;s SERPs after implementing the duplicate content precautions.</p>
<p>However, what is unclear is the fact that many WordPress installations manage to go unpunished by Google without taking any of the precautions. It seems a bit hit and miss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neil...</title>
		<link>http://www.milienzo.com/2007/03/14/wordpress-duplicate-content-and-the-power-of-google/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>neil...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milienzo.com/2007/03/14/wordpress-duplicate-content-and-the-power-of-google/#comment-69</guid>
		<description>This is odd, I was under the imporession that Google punished duplicate content across different IPs or domains and that it was intelligent enough to work out the blog issue as you describe - otherwise all blogs would be hit by this problem. Are you absolutely sure it&#039;s just a duplicate content issue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is odd, I was under the imporession that Google punished duplicate content across different IPs or domains and that it was intelligent enough to work out the blog issue as you describe &#8211; otherwise all blogs would be hit by this problem. Are you absolutely sure it&#8217;s just a duplicate content issue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.milienzo.com/2007/03/14/wordpress-duplicate-content-and-the-power-of-google/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milienzo.com/2007/03/14/wordpress-duplicate-content-and-the-power-of-google/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t blacklisted, but the duplicate pages were being filtered out of search results. I know this happened because my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.milienzo.com/2007/02/10/top-10-plugins-for-a-wordpress-newbie/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Top 10 plugins&lt;/a&gt; post made it into the first page of search results and was giving me quite a bit of traffic. Then one day it was gone.

Even if I searched for unique strings of text from the post, it wouldn&#039;t show in Google&#039;s search results.

Since implementing the changes in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seoresearcher.com/how-to-make-your-wordpress-blog-duplicate-content-safe.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SEO Marketing Research&lt;/a&gt; article, I contacted Google to let them know I felt I was being unfairly filtered and yesterday I started seeing Google traffic again.

Sure enough, the Top 10 plugins post is back in the SERPS, but has slipped to page 2 now. Nevermind, I&#039;m just relieved to be back in Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t blacklisted, but the duplicate pages were being filtered out of search results. I know this happened because my <a href="http://www.milienzo.com/2007/02/10/top-10-plugins-for-a-wordpress-newbie/" rel="nofollow">Top 10 plugins</a> post made it into the first page of search results and was giving me quite a bit of traffic. Then one day it was gone.</p>
<p>Even if I searched for unique strings of text from the post, it wouldn&#8217;t show in Google&#8217;s search results.</p>
<p>Since implementing the changes in the <a href="http://www.seoresearcher.com/how-to-make-your-wordpress-blog-duplicate-content-safe.htm" rel="nofollow">SEO Marketing Research</a> article, I contacted Google to let them know I felt I was being unfairly filtered and yesterday I started seeing Google traffic again.</p>
<p>Sure enough, the Top 10 plugins post is back in the SERPS, but has slipped to page 2 now. Nevermind, I&#8217;m just relieved to be back in Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberdose</title>
		<link>http://www.milienzo.com/2007/03/14/wordpress-duplicate-content-and-the-power-of-google/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>uberdose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milienzo.com/2007/03/14/wordpress-duplicate-content-and-the-power-of-google/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>How do you know it was duplicate content? Are you really blacklisted or just lost some positions (like from #5 to #140)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you know it was duplicate content? Are you really blacklisted or just lost some positions (like from #5 to #140)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
